Dear Wilbert, thanks for Your reply. The solution You suggested, seems to be the best!
2009/11/24 <[email protected]> > Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re:\set vs \override (Francisco Vila) > 2. Re:another problem with partcombine (David Kastrup) > 3. Re:another problem with partcombine (Wilbert Berendsen) > 4. Re:\set vs \override (Nick Payne) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:09:41 +0100 > From: Francisco Vila <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: \set vs \override > To: [email protected] > Cc: David Kastrup <[email protected]>, [email protected] > Message-ID: > <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > 2009/11/24 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[email protected]>: > > I think you send a lot of mail. I suggest reading code; if it were > > easy, where would the fun be? > > Sorry if it sounds angry. My humble opinion is that it's absolutely > NOT FUN to have a future without LilyPond because reading the code was > not easy enough. > > > As a hint: > > Every hint is immensely appreciated, of course. I agree in that > labyrinths are fun to solve, but not if that means the project running > out of developers and especially if somebody knows the path. > > Sorry again, I had to say it. > -- > Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) > www.paconet.org > www.csmbadajoz.com > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:31:03 +0100 > From: David Kastrup <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: another problem with partcombine > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > Stefan Thomas <[email protected]> writes: > > > Dear community, > > I've got another problem with partcombine. > > Is there a possibilitie to force lilypond to print the following > (whithin the > > partcombine-command) in tow different voices? > > \version "2.12.2" > > > > upper = \relative c' { > > r8 c e g e c > > } > > lower = \relative c' { > > c4 r2 > > } > > > > all ={ \new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower } } > > \score { \all } > > That does not sound like you want the parts combined after all. Maybe > something like > > << { \upper } \\ { \lower } >> > > is what you want rather than \partcombine \upper \lower ? > > -- > David Kastrup > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:43:43 +0100 > From: Wilbert Berendsen <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: another problem with partcombine > To: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Op dinsdag 24 november 2009 schreef Stefan: > > > Dear community, > > I've got another problem with partcombine. > > Is there a possibilitie to force lilypond to print the following > (whithin > > the partcombine-command) in tow different voices? > > \version "2.12.2" > > > > upper = \relative c' { > > r8 c e g e c > > } > > lower = \relative c' { > > c4 r2 > > } > > > > all ={ \new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower } } > > \score { \all } > > > > The partcombine command tries to "melt" the voices together. It you want to > have 2 different voices you don't need the partcombine command, just enter > the > two voices with a voice separator in between, like the second score in this > example: > > upper = \relative c' { > r8 c e g e c > } > > lower = \relative c' { > c4 r2 > } > > \score { > \new Staff { \partcombine \upper \lower } > } > > \score { > \new Staff << \upper \\ \lower >> > } > > or: > > \score { > \new Staff << > \new Voice { \voiceOne \upper } > \new Voice { \voiceTwo \lower } > >> > } > > best regards, > Wilbert Berendsen > > -- > Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/ > Nederlands LilyPond forum: http://www.lilypondforum.nl/ > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/lilypond-user/attachments/20091124/5dff2065/attachment.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:57:23 +1100 > From: Nick Payne <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: \set vs \override > To: James Worlton <[email protected]> > Cc: lilypond-user <[email protected]> > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > James Worlton wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On Nov 23, 2009, at 9:26 PM, Nick Payne wrote: > > > >> On this subject of set vs override, if I want rehearsal marks to be > >> boxed letters and also want to use the letter I as a rehearsal mark, > >> how can I do that. Each set command overwrites the previous value of > >> the context property, so if I use: > >> > >> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters > >> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-alphabet > >> > >> then I get "I" as a rehearsal mark but the letters aren't boxed, and > >> if I use: > >> > >> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-alphabet > >> \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-letters > >> > > > > In 2.13.6 I did a project and used: > > \set Score.markFormatter = #format-mark-box-alphabet > > and I got the boxes and the letter I (all in one command!) > Thanks for that. That particular value for set > (format-mark-box-alphabet) doesn't seem to appear anywhere in the > documentation - or at least, I can't find it in the PDF documentation, > which is what I use. > > Nick > > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > > > End of lilypond-user Digest, Vol 84, Issue 102 > ********************************************** >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
