Alexander Kobel wrote:
> Federico Bruni wrote:
>> Even this (just repeat without alternatives) does not work:
>>
>> \parallelMusic #'(VoiceA VoiceB) {
>> \repeat volta 2 {
>> r4 g' c e ~ |
>> c,1 |
>>
>> e4 g, c e ~ |
>> b1 |
>> }
>> }
>
> Everything inside the \repeat braces is considered as a single music
> expression, so I'm not surprised if \parallelMusic does not even try to
> subdivide it.
>
ok, now I see, thanks.
>
>> I can't understand what you mean with "instantiating a \parallelMusic
>> construct for every volta and alternative".
>
> I meant something like the following:
>
> \parallelMusic #'(partIA partIB) { ... }
> \parallelMusic #'(repeatA repeatB) { ... }
> \parallelMusic #'(altIA altIB) { ... }
> \parallelMusic #'(altIIA altIIB) { ... }
> \parallelMusic #'(partIIA partIIB) { ... }
>
> voiceA = {
> \partIA
> \repeat unfold 2 \repeatA
> \alternative {
> \altIA
> \altIIA
> }
> \partIIA
> }
> voiceB = { ... } % the same for B
>
> It's ugly, I know - but at least it should work, and as long as you
> don't have too many repeats, it might be worth it.
>
>
Thanks for the example, now I understand.
Yes, it's quite ugly ;-)
I was attracted by \parallelMusic because it makes easier to see and
modify the input..
I think I'll use it for simple things, but I'll stick to the old ways
for more complex pieces.
Federico
--
http://gnurag.net/blog/
http://fsfe.org/
http://groups.fsf.org/wiki/LibrePlanetItalia
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
