On Fri, 2009-12-18 at 12:01 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:32:50PM -0800, Jonathan Wilkes wrote: > >> > If you can suggest an improvement, especially in the > >> > Introduction pages, please do. > >> > >> LilyPondTool, Frescobaldi, Emacs and Vim are listed under > >> "Alternate Input." Since this link is to the right of "Text > >> Input," the implication is that they are alternatives to text > >> input, which of course is false: All the information under the > >> "Text input" link applies to these programs. > > > > Hmm. I'm trying to tie these two together: text input and > > alternate input are both the same color, and end in "input". > > > >> Maybe change "Alternate Input" to "Input software," or "Input > >> programs," or "Progams, At least One of Which You Will Use to Enter > >> Your Scores if You At All Value Your Time and Sanity." > > > > I'm willing to change the name, but I'm not convinced that any of > > thsoe are more attractive than "alternate input". More to the point, > > the bottom of "text input" tries to direct people there, with the > > "easier editing environments" stuff. > > "Input aids". > > > Hmm, on second thought, what about calling it "Easier editing"? That > > alliterates, so it gets a 20% bonus to its attractiveness. :) > > But it is mostly wrong since the graphical programs usually don't allow > editing existing input at all, but rather _generate_ or export Lilypond > input. >
'Aids' isn't much better for the layman than 'editor', 'GUI', etc. How about 'Other input methods'? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
