Just out of curiosity... Assuming for the moment that development interest might materialize if there were money involved, approximately how much sponsorship dollars would be involved to tackle this?
Jack -- Jack Cooper, BerLen Music www.berlenmusic.com www.jack-cooper.com ----- Original Message ---- > From: Graham Percival <[email protected]> > To: Martin Tarenskeen <[email protected]> > Cc: lilypond-user mailinglist <[email protected]> > Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 6:51:26 AM > Subject: Re: Lilypond to MusicXML (was: Re: New Sibelius to LilyPond > conversion suite) > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 10:45:58AM +0100, Martin Tarenskeen wrote: > > > > But the main problem remains: Lilypond developers are also very happy > > Lilypond users, which could explain the lack of motivation to put a lot > > of time and effort exporting to a format that only people who do NOT use > > Lilypond really need ? .... > LilyPond is open source. That means that you can see the workings > of the software. LilyPond is Free software. That means that you > can legally improve and distribute the software. Neither of those > means that people who have improved LilyPond in the past are under > ANY kind of obligation to you. > > You're blaming lilypond developer for not doing a job that *you* > are not willing to do. That's not on. > .... > > - Graham > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
