Tim McNamara <[email protected]> writes: > Is there a reason that the reply-to header is not set for the mailing > list? This is the only mailing list I have ever participated in > which does not have this header set and it results in replies being > sent to individuals instead of the list quite regularly. In a list > like this where is explicitly asked that discussions take place in > the list and not back-channel, it seems like it would make sense to > have the header set so that replies are sent to the list by default.
Yes, there is a reason. http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html http://marc.merlins.org/netrants/listreplyto.txt -- Michael Welsh Duggan ([email protected]) _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
