On Sun, 03 Oct 2010 15:30:34 +0200, Marten Visser <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello,
[...]
In the following example, everything has been properly scaled down,
except for the crescendo. Thanks for looking!
==============================
%{
Example:
graphical dynamics do not scale
%}
\version "2.13.32"
% ------------------- Notes ----------------------
musicalContent = #(define-music-function (parser location) ()
#{
e4 c' c8 c a4 |
s4\p s s\< s\f |
#}) % End of musicalContent
% ---------------- Typesetting -------------------
\parallelMusic #'(MusicalData DynamicalData)
\musicalContent
\score { <<
\new Staff
\with {
instrumentName = "small"
fontSize = #-3
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3)
}
{
\relative c' \MusicalData
}
\new Dynamics
\with {
fontSize = #-3
\override StaffSymbol #'staff-space = #(magstep -3)
\override DynamicText #'font-size = #-3
\override DynamicLineSpanner #'font-size = #-3
}
{
\DynamicalData
}
\new Staff
\with {
instrumentName = "normal"
}
{
\relative c' \MusicalData
}
\new Dynamics
{
\DynamicalData
}
>>
}
your example works fine in 2.12.3 by defining the Dynamics context as in
the template Learning Manual "A.2.4 Piano centered dynamics"
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond-learning/Piano-templates#Piano-templates
In 2.13, it is internally pre-defined, but I guess the definition is quite
similar. perhaps a regression?
greetings,
Vicente
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
