On 6 October 2010 00:50, Carl Sorensen <[email protected]> wrote: > LilyPond midi was not created as a performance midi, but as a proofhearing > midi.
I appreciate that. It's just that the proofreading is harder if, for example, it plays straight off the end of the piece and into the coda (which can be really jarring if one is in a different key to the one from which one /intends/ to jump into the coda). I can understand that it's not a priority, though. -- Tim Rowe _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
