On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 07:49 -0500, Ralph Palmer wrote:
> > > Greetings and thanks, Colin - > > The second case is unexpected (to me) because I thought that \dynamic > was a font command, as is \italic. Even if the \dynamic in the second > case is attached to the d and then overwritten by the "meno", why > isn't the "meno" overwritten in the first case by the \dynamic? > > > Pondly, > > Ralph Thanks for your patience with a new bug squad member, Ralph. I've added this as an issue: http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1448 The correction is as Jan-Peter suggests: to use a \line before the elements you want to have in sequence, otherwise they get over-written. The issue is that the behaviour is triggered by a \dynamic as the first element, but the \line protects you from that. HTH, Ralph Colin -- The purpose of a fish trap is to catch fish, and when the fish are caught, the trap is forgotten. The purpose of a rabbit snare is to catch rabbits. When the rabbits are caught, the snare is forgotten. The purpose of words is to convey ideas. When the ideas are grasped, the words are forgotten. Where can I find a man who has forgotten words? He is the one I would like to talk to. - The Chuang Tzu _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
