David -----Original Message----- From: David Rogers <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 11:40:08 -0800 To: James Lowe <[email protected]> Cc: LilyPond User <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Using #(define fonts) gives me an ill-looking feta font
>>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Timothy Sheasby <[email protected]> >>>Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 10:21:05 +0200 >>>To: David Rogers <[email protected]> >>>Cc: LilyPond User <[email protected]> >>>Subject: Re: Using #(define fonts) gives me an ill-looking feta font >>> >>>>Try changing the second number in the font tree parameter --> (/ >>>>myStaffSize 20) >>>>I have been using this parameter and find this fixed a similar problem >>>>I >>>>had. Can't remember why it had to be 20 but that's what worked for me. >>> >>>That, sadly didn't change anything, I also removed/commented my >>>'#(set-global-staff-size 24)' in the main file and that did revert back >>>to >>>the correct-looking glyphs but the staff size is now too small and >>>*just* >>>using this 'define' setting seems to do nothing to the actual staff size >>>of my file. >>> >>>The default is too small, so at this time as I still don't know what >>>this >>>'myStaffSize' entry does or doesn't do and as this seems to be the only >>>documented way of establishing whole document fonts, I am forced >>>(unfortunately) to use explicit overrides in each of my sixteen scores >>>(sigh). >>> >>>Do any 'schemers' understand this 'define' and perhaps give me some >>>clues >>>on how to use this without it affecting my glyphs? >>> >>>Thank you both for the tips though. >> >> >> >> >>Try putting: >>#(set-global-staff-size 24) >> >> >>AND, in each \layout block: >>#(layout-set-staff-size 24) >> >>...while the myStaffSize are both left at 20. > > >Sorry I answered too quickly. My suggestion may fix some problems, but >it also reverts most fonts to default, thereby completely missing the >point. > Yes you are right. I will have to see which method leaves me with less work - at least I have another option, thanks though for the suggestion. James > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
