"Christopher R. Maden" <[email protected]> writes: > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/ambletown.pdf >
Looks nice! > 1) Verse pick-ups. There have been several suggestions that cover this. > 2) Alternate rhythms. There are a lot of small differences in the > rhythms of the verses. You can see this implicit in the current score, > where there are same-pitch melisata and skipped notes. > > I would like instead to have the first verse’s rhythm in full-size > notation, with variations for subsequent verses in small notes or rests. I'd say no. The score is very readable, clear, and non-ambiguous. I don't think anyone will misinterpret the way it must be sung. It would be different if you had differing melodies or different rhythms for verses. In this score it's just a matter of singing or skipping a note. (For a really differing melody I's suggest a small helper staff.) -- Johan _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
