Albu wrote: > > I wanted to put dynamic under the chord itself, not under the name of the > chord > yes, i had misunderstood!
Albu wrote: > > I found an espressivo and an sforzando to put in place, its as close as > I've got, but it is not stylized nor correct. > Eluze wrote: > > what is the disapproval exaxtly? > my question is: what do you dislike with the default output of _\espressivo and _> ? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Dynamics-on-chords-tp31642805p31696367.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
