2011/6/3 Peter O'Doherty <[email protected]>: > On 06/03/2011 12:45 AM, Francisco Vila wrote: >> >> 2011/6/2 Peter O'Doherty<[email protected]>: >>> >>> Thank you all for your help. David's solution was just the one I needed. >>> Best wishes, >>> Peter >> >> Here is a beautiful example of something I've been suspecting for >> months. No matter how fast I reply to a question in this list, my >> reply only reaches other recipients's mailboxes after several hours. >> :-( > > I'm not sure if that's correct. I sent my original message at 17:00 but > didn't reply until 20:38. The delay was therefore mine. (I'm also replying > to this message at 07:48 after receiving it at 12:45!)
Oh, I am not blaming you. My concern is, my reply was 15 minutes after your first message, and every single further answer seems to ignore that one. That occurred _many_ times in this list, and it's really discouraging. I can only guess the problem is that my own messages last hours to reach others. Or maybe reading previous replies before writing a new one is not as common as I thought. -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
