2011/6/7 Nick Payne <[email protected]>: > On 07/06/11 17:05, Francisco Vila wrote: >> >> 2011/6/7 Nick Payne<[email protected]>: >>> >>> I have created a searchable indexed PDF portfolio from the 2.14 English >>> PDF >>> docs (Extending, Internals, Learning, Notation, Snippets, Usage, and Web) >>> and uploaded it to http://www.users.on.net/~njpayne/music/lilydoc.pdf. >>> >>> You need Adobe Reader 9.x or later. 3rd party PDF readers can't cope with >>> PDF portfolios. >> >> Okular offers to save all embedded files. >> >> Is there a difference between this and a single PDF with all the pages >> of each document, plus some added pages at the beginning? If not, it >> is easy to make one using pdftk which would be readable with free >> software. > > They're not the same beast. With a PDF portfolio there is already an > embedded index, and you can search for a term across all the embedded files > at once, and get back, in a separate window, a clickable list of the hits > and which file(s) they occur in. If you just concatenate the separate PDFs, > searching will a) be slow, and b) be sequential only.
Right, but if the embedded PDFs are not modified in any way, then --I imagine-- what is missing is only that additional index which could be generated and concatenated together. Could it be? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) www.paconet.org , www.csmbadajoz.com _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
