Hi Kieren, On 10/07 08:45:34, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Don't know what's causing the issue here, but I believe this version > of your snippet does what you want: [ snip ]
Ha! Well, I can't deny it does seem to avoid the problem demonstrated by my original example, though I must admit I have no idea why it works and the original didn't. :) Unfortunately I don't think it helps with my real problem though, which is that I want to keep on having sections with a "new" sopranoOneVoice followed by unison sections, etc... and I don't think it's possible to do that and still have a single \lyricsto "sopranoOneVoice" definition inside the "\score". See this demonstration of what I mean in this (slightly) extended version of your solution (which is just the same two bars again with different lyrics): http://flooble.net/~pete/bugdemo-partial-fix.ly ...which renders like this: http://flooble.net/~pete/bugdemo-partial-fix.png You can see that the "Five six sev --" text doesn't appear at all for the second sopranoOneVoice segment. Not that I'd *expect* it to, of course - just because those two sections have the same name doesn't mean they're the same voice. But I suppose I could have a whole bunch of distinct named voices - eg. "sopranoOneVoice01", "sopranoOneVoice02", ..., "sopranoOneVoice57". That would at least make it possible to link the correct lyrics for every new "sopranoOne??" section via the appropriate temporary voice name in the "\score" section. > Hope this helps! It definitely does, thank you. I can't say I really *like* my idea based on your suggestion, but I definitely dislike it much less than my previous alternatives. :) > Kieren. Thanks again, Pete. -- A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
