On 20 July 2011 13:27, Xavier Scheuer <x.sche...@gmail.com> wrote: > I was wondering if you (or someone else) would have maybe a workaround > I could use in order to have a fairly good output for the code attached > to #1724 ? > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1724
Let me think about it for a bit. I have an idea using a scheme engraver which might work. > PS : Please note that since issue 620 has no lilypond code showing the > consequences of this issue, it is difficult for a lambda user to > understand it, hence IMHO the several duplicate report of this issue. You're welcome to add snippets to it rather than relying on the links to the merged issues (we could also mention the Dynamics context in the issue title). Cheers, Neil _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
