David Kastrup wrote:
>
> The tie configuration at the time of the tie ending counts, so try
> \relative c' {
> <c e g>2~
> \once
> \override TieColumn #'tie-configuration =
> #'( ( 8 . -1)
> ( 3 . 1 )
> ( -3 . 1)
> )
> q |
> <d f a>~ q
> }
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
Yes. But the Notation Reference demonstrates:
\relative c' {
<c e g>2~ <c e g>
\override TieColumn #'tie-configuration =
#'((0.0 . 1) (-2.0 . 1) (-4.0 . 1))
<c e g>2~ <c e g>
}
And with \laissezVibrer or \repeatTie it works, using this syntax. Setting
\once gives a result as expected.
\relative c' {
<c e g>2 ~ q
\once
\override LaissezVibrerTieColumn #'tie-configuration =
#'(( 8 . -1)( 3 . 1 )( -3 . 1))
<c e g>2\laissezVibrer <d f a>\laissezVibrer
}
\relative c' {
<c e g>2 ~ q
\once
\override RepeatTieColumn #'tie-configuration =
#'(( 8 . -1)( 3 . 1 )( -3 . 1))
<c e g>2\repeatTie <d f a>\repeatTie
}
Cheers,
Harm
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Why-can%27t-I-%5Coverride-TieColumn--%27tie-configuration-only-%5Conce--tp32222279p32222455.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
