On Fri 26 Aug 2011, 11:59 David Kastrup wrote:
> Your complaint about my code focused on the consequences of doing the
> crescendo in a separate voice. Which I did not do.
I am sorry.
> So could you focus your critique on << c1 { s4 s2\< s4\! } >> (or
> whatever the exact timing was) rather than on your multi-voice strawman?
No, I could not.
I don't like this way of adjusting hairpins. Nothing more.
Probably, if I _would_ be musician, I would not like (too!) this way because
of those strange "spacing rests" (what is "spacing rest" in music after all?),
which I would consider as being "not a music and not rests, at all, that's why
they are strange", probably.
Sorry for the noise.
Probably, I would like those "\<{...}" more. I don't know .)
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk "Easy to use" is easy to say.
Bug Squad -- Jeff Garbers
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
