Hello, On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Nick Payne <nick.pa...@internode.on.net> wrote: > I've been setting some Carcassi studies. His Op60 No 8 has a "pf" dynamic > marking at one point (see > http://erato.uvt.nl/files/imglnks/usimg/c/c8/IMSLP34430-PMLP03629-ribs0980_06.pdf, > fifth stave on the first page), which does not exist in Lilypond. I added > the variable definition pf = #(make-dynamic-script "pf") to my ly source, > but is there any reason why this should not be added to > dynamic-scripts-init.ly? That already contains fp as a dynamic marking, why > not pf? > > Nick >
I don't see why it couldn't contain more permutations of 'p', 'f' and even 'z' (I seem to remember that I had to manually create a dynamic for a few pieces that had things like szfp or sfffp (or similar - I cannot remember). However there maybe those more musically educated to say why we shouldn't or if we should simply include all permutations from sfz to sffffffffffffffffz et al. Regards -- -- James _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
