I'd like to add that I think that Lilypond's main strength is as a typesetting/publishing programme. For composing and arranging, I find it's better to have a page of blank manuscript in front of you that you can 'fill in', something that Lilypond's text-input paradigm doesn't really allow for. But once all the information is there, making changes is relatively easy, and the printed results are, of course, sublime.
Brent. On 23 September 2011 01:53, Tim Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Janek Warchoł wrote: > > If your friend would like to see what Lily can do, i'd show him this: > > http://www.apollinemike.com/scores/granini.pdf > > From a publishing perspective, that's impressive on a nearly magical > scale. As a musician, please forgive my parochial and archaic attitude, > but that's nuts. > > -- > Tim Roberts, [email protected] > Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user >
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
