Yes, that makes sense. How do I submit an enhancement request? To "bugs"?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Keith OHara <[email protected]> wrote: > Neil Thornock <neilthornock <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> Is there a way to create an accidental style that >> checks for *simultaneous* pitches in any octave, resulting, in this >> example, in a natural on the top note? >> > > > No, unfortunately; the information available to the accidental-setting rule > is only the set of accidentals in /previous/ notes and key signature. An > unfortunate design choice, but one I can forgive because in traditional > music simultaneous conflicting accidentals are rare. > > No doubt, you know how to force accidentals. <f! fis!> > > I don't see an enhancement request to solve this problem; the closest > is <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1134>. The manual > does explain the limitation in the section on > Pitches::DisplayingPitches::AutomaticAccidentals. > > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user -- Neil Thornock, D.M. No Stopping, Standing, or Parking: http://neilthornock.net/mp3s/nostopping.mp3 Assistant Professor of Music Composition/Theory Brigham Young University _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
