Hello,

On 3 December 2011 06:55, Paul Scott <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> 2.15.20:
>
> Should the positioning of \tempo over notes be different than over whole
> rests?
> If so, can I make the second behavior like the first?
>
> \version "2.15.20"
>
> \relative c'' {
>  \tempo "text over notes" c1 c c c \break
>  \tempo "text over whole rest(s)" R1*4 c1 c c c c c c
> }
>
>
> Something like

\version "2.14.1"

\relative c'' {
 \tempo "text over notes" c1 c c c \break
 \textLengthOn
 r1^\markup { "text over whole rest(s)" } R1*3 c1 c c c c c c
 }

although that doesn't quite give you the 'proper' R1 positioning.

\version "2.14.1"

\relative c'' {
 \tempo "text over notes" c1 c c c \break
 \textLengthOn
 s1*0^\markup { "text over whole rest(s)" } R1*4 c1 c c c c c c
 }

also works

see some snippets in

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation-big-page#full-measure-rests



-- 
--

James
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to