The way I typically set up a project is to have a score file for the conductor's score and each of the parts, all of which \include a file which contains all the music for the piece. I also have each of these files (the score files and the music file) \include library files with my various snippets, as well as a file containing all the instrumentDefinition's needed in the project. What I want to be able to do is to use different instrumentDefinition's in the conductor's score file versus the parts score-files. This would, for example, allow me to have a different transposition in the conductor's score than in the part. The intuitive way to accomplish that would seem to be putting \include "instrumentDefs.ly" in the score file, rather than the music file, but that throws a compile error because the instrumentSwitch occurs in the music file. I could, I suppose, just use parallel instrumentDefinition's, and write something like:
\tag #'score \instrumentSwitch "clarinet_score" \tag #'parts \instrumentSwitch "clarinet_parts" I was just wondering if it might be possible to do it some other way. The nice thing about \instrumentSwitch is that it is semantic. Given that the differences between score and parts presentational (e.g. different transposition), I'd prefer to just write \instrumentSwitch "clarinet" and accomplish the score/parts difference some other way. Suggestions? -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/different-instrumentDefinition%27s-in-score-and-parts-tp33001219p33001219.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
