PMA wrote:
...
Yes, I've sniffed & posted in IMSLP's site now -- enough to see
that my "public-domain-like status" fears were misconceived,
and to appreciate the gist of licenses being offered. I tend to
expect that their 6th listed,
Attribution + Non-commercial + No Derivatives
would do me just fine (provided I can overcome the guilt from
refusing to offer my works up as programmers' fodder :) ).
That last was pretty snotty! So, appreciating the help that
several of you have extended, I feel obliged to add --
*If* I thought that my __newbie!__ .ly code were worthy of
being shown to others (as I apparently think its results are),
then I might reconsider *whether* to show it. But there's
just no way I could think this.
Best regards,
Pete
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
