On 01/25/2012 04:52 PM, James wrote: > So someone is going to have to convince me that \bar is bad.
For the same reason that semantic markup in text is preferred: <glossterm>semantic markup</glossterm> vs. <bold>semantic markup</bold>. You know what you want your text (prose or music) to look like today, but you may not know what you want it to look like tomorrow. Let’s say your repeated sequence ends up across a couple of page turns in the score and the conductor complains. If you are using \repeat, you can slap in an \unfoldRepeats pretty easily which will also do the right thing with alternative endings, and without losing the fact that the section is a repeat. Or you can just change \repeat volta to \repeat unfold in one place. If you aren’t using \repeat, you would have to remove your bars and copy and paste the repeated section for every part, and possibly other complications as well. And MIDI is a pretty good argument — maybe you don’t intend to share it with anyone, but I find it a pretty good way to “proofread” a score for wrong notes. ~Chris -- Chris Maden, text nerd <URL: http://crism.maden.org/ > “Be wary of great leaders. Hope that there are many, many small leaders.” — Pete Seeger _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
