On Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:42:03 +0100 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> Nils <l...@nilsgey.de> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to ask for a quick confirmation, since I never worked > > with an even-numbered staff line count. > > > > If you reduce your stafflines with > > \override StaffSymbol #'line-count = #3 > > or #1 or any odd number there is no question. With a treble clef the > > b' is on the middle line and lines are removed/added above and below. > > > > with even numbers like #2 or #4 the b' is not on a line anymore but > > all stafflines move one step down so a' and c'' are now on the lines. > > > > Is this correct and common engraver practice? > > Anything but a line count of 5 is not common engraver practice with > modern clefs. The various clefs have a dedicated _line_ they are > focused on. G for the treble clef, F for the bass clef, C for the viola > (tenor?) clef. For square chant notation, you tend to have four lines > and an older clef pointing out the C. > > Personally, I don't know the vertical position of the standard clefs > when using four lines, but I would be very much surprised if they lost > the fixed relation to their "key" line. > > -- > David Kastrup > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > lilypond-user@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user > Hello again, I talked to a few persons in the university today and they all agreed that the line on which a clef is is variable for any number of lines. But a clef should be never be in between lines, which is what Lilypond does. Nils _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
