W dniu 10 lutego 2012 14:30 użytkownik Graham Percival <[email protected]> napisał: > I suggest the following: > > 1) pick a specific work, or body of works, which are > unquestionably in the public domain. A Dvorak string quartet? > Beethoven piano concerto? Bach chorales? Something already in > mutopia? > (actually, I quite like the mutopia angle, since then nobody needs > to spend time typing in a score)
I don't think that's a good idea. People will read the description and say "what's the point? the score is already available, in free format! i better spend my money on something like Open Goldberg Variations". Remember that most people cannot tell good engraving from bad one. Even many musicians don't; my conductor - otherwise a really competent musician - uses finale-crap scores that make me cry, and doesn't even notice any problem. See how Musescore Open Goldberg Variations advertised themselves: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/293573191/open-goldberg-variations-setting-bach-free/posts/61854 The Musescore-made snippet is not that great engraving-wise, but people dug it. W dniu 10 lutego 2012 14:36 użytkownik Graham Percival <[email protected]> napisał: > I know that lots of people will want lots of fancy stuff like > lyrics, tablature, orchestral scores, contemporary notation, etc > -- but I really, really, strongly suggest that you aim to have a > turn-over of a month at most in the beginning, which means keeping > the first few scores being fairly simple and small. +1000 cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
