2012/5/7 Urs Liska <[email protected]>: > And I really stronly suggest, that - in addition to discussing the technical > aspects - people think about submitting entries to Mike. > I can't imagine that there aren't quite a few 'tweetable' projects out > there. > And I would consider it a very contraproductive 'statement' if it would > remain a list of only two projects ...
Would you "tweet" about a small LilyPond song score in a church magazine? That’s one of my regular uses, and I consider it "too minor". My other "main use" are song sheets/booklets for my private pleasure, and since they contain mostly copyrighted songs, I can’t publish them, unfortunately. And I guess a lot of other users have similar problems – how much sense makes a tweet about some unspectacular internal use of LilyPond? Greetlings, Hraban _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
