> I suppose the situation might be as follows: source code is freely > available (on website, github or whatever), but the binaries are not. > Anyone tech-savvy enough to serve himself doesn't have to pay, but > "simple users" do have. I think that if the price was low (say, 5$) > nobody might be interested in forking it.
All of the donations I've made to open source projects have been in the $25 range. > And actually, releasing source for free but binaries for fee makes > some sense. Agreed. Especially on platforms where build environments aren't free or installed. Jeff _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
