On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 08:35:40AM +0200, Janek Warcho wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:14 AM, Keith OHara <[email protected]> wrote: > > Colin Hall <colinghall <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> Have you had a chance to try your Lilypond source with an official binary > >> release yet? > > > > So far, Eluze tried to reproduce the problem with some released builds, > > and saw no error message. > > > > I've tried to reproduce the problem in the current build, compiled with > > debugging turned on. ??(I also looked a bit at likely sources for this > > error and didn't find any trouble.) ??So unless we hear more there seems > > to be nothing to worry about. > > On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:16 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: > > The only wrong thing I can detect is not reporting this to the > > lilypond-bug list, but it would seem like you can easily fix that. > > Marcos, did you send anything to [email protected]? If so, it > couldn't have reached us, and we kindly ask to resend to to > [email protected].
Thanks, Janek, but if there's confusion here it is due to me. The original report was to lilypond-user. Rather than get the user to go through the dance of posting the same material to bug-lilypond I just treated it as a bug report. Keith and Eluze have investigated and found no issue. I think we're done. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
