Gerry Prosser <[email protected]> writes: > David ... thanks, and yes indeed. And I run convert-ly on every new > score I create with denemo, so there really is no excuse for not > engaging brain on this occasion 8-) > > Thanks for all the gentle admonishments from around the community > .....
Well, it is a frequent question about an invasive change. And one argument in favor of going through with it was that convert-ly actually was able to convert a sizeable ratio of Scheme code automatically. Since I spent considerable time getting convert-ly to do an unprecedented amount of work, you can find me pointing to it frequently. With this particular syntax change, "remove everything that looks like a mistake" will tend to work as well, as someone else noted in a parallel answer, and that actually was the motivation for the change. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
