Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 10:45 PM, David Kastrup <[email protected]> wrote: >> "Peter Gentry" <[email protected]> writes: >>> { g'''4 -\tweak #'X-offset #-2.7 \p ( \< e'''4 \! \> d'''4 \!) } >> >> Well, I am working on getting rid of the - in -\tweak but it's tricky. > > I'm crossing fingers for you :)
Thanks. This seemingly little change is actually a codependent part of quite a package in the department of making LilyPond more powerful and consistent. So it's taking some time, and it can't be done independently of other work. That's also one of the things one can't really "decide" as part of a policy since it takes a lot of work somebody has to do, while the results don't really pose much of a vote: previously valid scores continue working, and a number of things which one feels _should_ have worked start doing so instead of failing for complex technical reasons one really cannot easily deliver good user-accessible explanations for. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
