>> So, i still think that we shouldn't allow "c2 4 4" despite some
>> really nice benefits it could bring us.
>
> Well, it won't affect previously valid programs. And it would have
> some nice side effects, including
>
> c4~ | 1~ | 2.
>
> with or without bar checks or spaces, and reasonably straightforward
> underpinnings and semantics.
So let's keep that as one of the first results of our GLISS
discussion, together with your suggestions for improved syntax of
\tempo.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
