Never mind--I found the solution: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=794
I only just discovered the LSR, so I completely forgot to check there before bothering everyone here. Oops. :-P DR -----Original Message----- From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk] Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 12:46 PM To: lilypond-user@gnu.org; David Kastrup; Daniel Rosen Subject: Re: Modified laissez vibrer ties David Kastrup wrote Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:07 AM > Daniel Rosen <drose...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I did consider that; the problem is those ties go _over_ the barline >> instead of stopping just short, so they'd still need to be adjusted >> manually. > > I tried using normal ties to invisible notes after the barline and > tweaking to-barline in order to have them stop short. I have not been > able to make to-barline have any effect, though. Not very elegant, but this might be a possibility: \relative c'' { \override Slur #'to-barline = ##t a1*3/4( \once \hideNotes a4) a1 } or, if you prefer, \relative c'' { a1*3/4 -\tweak #'to-barline ##t ( \once \hideNotes a4) a1 } Unlike hairpins, 'to-barline for Slurs seems to extend the slur to the _next_ bar line rather than stopping it short at the previous one. And the hidden note seems to require a non-zero duration too. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
