On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:57 AM, James Harkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually not a complaint! But inspired by the thread on upgrading vs not > upgrading, where it was suggested that LP has become inherently more complex > and harder to use, even for simple typesetting. > > [...] > > I just wanted to mention it as a case where LP certainly didn't throw up any > pointless roadblocks for basic usage. The improvements in the tool DO > matter.
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:02 AM, soundsfromsound <[email protected]> wrote: > I know what you mean. I think LilyPond produces beautiful scores and it only > gets better and better with each release. I look to get the most out of the > program and "squeeze" whatever I can; that includes more advanced engraving > options (i.e. "contemporary" notation/techniques, graphical and aleatoric > elements, etc). Thank you both, that's nice to hear! Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
