Mario Lang <[email protected]> writes: > Since about 4 years now I am working on Open Source software to > process (first write, now read) braille music code. > > My current subproject in that area is parsing braille music code and > converting it to another (visual) representation. While I have worked > lots with MusicXML in the past, it made more sense to start with > LilyPond when it comes to exporting my parse results.
It's nicer to generate than XML I should think, like PostScript is nicer to generate than PDF (and indeed, LilyPond goes via the PostScript path). But of course it is a bit more of a moving target. > As a small teaser, I include two examples in this mail directly. > First is the braille music code, followed by the LilyPond source > created from bmc2ly. If it is supposed to tease, this begs the question whether there is a considerable corpus of BMC available online. Would it be useful if LilyPond could export BMC? Possibly even just for verifying that your conversion has retained meaning? Would that be realistic? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
