2012/12/3 Noeck <[email protected]>: > > > Am 03.12.2012 00:29, schrieb David Nalesnik: > >>> \acciaccatura { e-\! } d4 \shape PhrasingSlur #'((0 . 1) (0 . 1.8) (0 . 1.8) >>> (0 . 0)) >>> >> >> Nick has given you the new syntax (as of 2.17.4). >> >> -David > > Why has that been inverted? To me, \shape PhrasingSlur #… is easier to > read than \shape #… PhrasingSlur. Could someone briefly explain the > reason for that? > > Cheers, > Joram > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Joram, AFAIR, the main reason was to achieve the possibility to use shape as a tweak. So one has to make sure, that the last argument of the function could be music. 2.16.1 shape = #(define-music-function (parser location grob offsets) (string? list?) 2.17.6 shape = #(define-music-function (parser location offsets item) (list? symbol-list-or-music?) Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
