Noeck wrote > It still seems to me like there might be a possiblity to simplify the > ly-syntax. Let me make a little comparison: > > I do not know the parser, but wouldn't it be possible to recognize > whether a named context already exists and use that one and if not > create a new one.
Have a look. You can see the LilyPond grammar in Appendix C of the Notation Reference. http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/Documentation/notation/lilypond-grammar Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
