Many thanks to all who replied.
2013/1/12 Keith OHara <[email protected]>
> > > \once\override Rest #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(0 . 9)
> > > r8 gis,,,,!32\([ b dis gis!
> > > \change Staff=upper \times 4/6 { b dis gis! b dis gis!\)] }
> >
> > Is there a preferred way using some staff spacing instead of using space
> > around a rest, that happens to be close by?
> >
>
> I think the staff spacing parameters take effect for the whole score.
>
Nope. I just copied and pasted the measure several times. When the measure
is at the next line I get the warning
no viable initial configuration found: may not find good beam slope
again with an ugly layout. The staff spacing seems to be affected only
\once.
Sometime before 2.18 I will need to find a new method. The best I can think
> of so far is to print a tall invisible box---a "phantom strut"---where I
> need
> space.
>
> r8-\tweak #'stencil #(ly:make-stencil '() '(0 . 0.1) '(0 . 6) )
> ^"request space above, so that the staves spread"
> gis,,,,!32\([ b dis gis!
> \change Staff=upper \times 4/6 { b dis gis! b dis gis!\)]
>
This works with 2.16 too. Should I prefer one method to the other because
of some side effects or can I use it interchangeable?
Regards
Helge
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
