Eluze <[email protected]> writes: > the big difference is that you can scale it in the \markup where you use it, > e.g. > \markup { > \fontsize #14 \bar-line #".|:" > \fontsize #-4 \bar-line #".|:" > } > will render two differently sized start repeat signs, whereas there is no > effect in the \markup \score { … } generated markup.
But that's something that we should likely strive to cure. Maybe \markup \score ... should be using a layout definition taking into account current sizes and/or settings? I am not saying that independent bar line code will not be independently useful (and \markup \score is rather expensive), but it is likely that there is some leeway for improving the semantics (if not the performance) of \markup \score as well. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
