Nick Payne writes: > On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote: >> Nick Payne <nick.payne <at> internode.on.net> writes: >> >>> To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10, >>> the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though >>> Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed at >>> the same height as normal fingering. >> Mike changed the fingering placement so that they go as close as they fit, >> for issue <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2764> >> >> It looks like your custom fingering stencil has a faked (shifted) extent >> so that it lines up as you wish. The fingering will fit, but its faked >> extent interferes with the stem. If I narrow the faked extent a bit, the >> fingering slides down along the stem. > > This hack seems to do the trick: >
Nick, I'm cleaning up bug-lilypond unanswered reports, and found this one from you. I take it that you have succeeded in updating your scheme code to deal with the change in fingering. So, I'm deciding that there is no bug here, and I trust that you are ok with that. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
