Nick Payne <[email protected]> writes: > <c-4>4 c-4 > > then if I use > > \remove "New_fingering_engraver" > > it removes the fingering on the first C (i.e. the chord) and leaves > the fingering on the second. If I use > > \remove "Fingering_engraver" > > it doesn't remove the fingering on either note.
Yes, it does. And since the Fingering_engraver no longer listens to fingering events, the rhythmic-event-iterator does not remove it from the note any more for broadcasting, and the New_fingering_engraver pitches in. You'll see by the placement algorithm (that of New_fingering_engraver is more focused on the notehead than the Fingering_engraver) that Fingering_engraver has had a replacement with a different style working. > If I use both the \remove commands then it removes the fingering on > both notes. So it seems one can remove the fingering from chorded > notes, or from all notes, but not just from unchorded notes. Remove the Fingering_engraver, _and_ add a dummy engraver listening to fingering events and ignoring them. Then New_fingering_engraver will not feel compelled taking over. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
