Actually on closer inspection the Webern score I was referring does *not*
have the same method of accidentals as the Universal edition of the Berg
piece - accidentals are only omitted when a pitch is immediately repeated
in the same octave (I think that's actually more readable especially when
bars can be very long).


On 5 March 2013 11:05, David G <[email protected]> wrote:

> I had been wondering that as well because I don't think it's all that
> unusual, at least for early 20th century music (I have some Webern scores
> printed in this way) but I couldn't see anything in the Lilypond
> documentation.
>
> If anyone has any suggestions I would be grateful too!
>
>
> On 2 March 2013 22:07, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Taking a look at Berg Op. 5 (see Sibelius-related discussion) I realized
>> that it uses a slight variant of the "dodecaphonic" accidental style: every
>> note has an accidental, but only for its _first_ appearance in the bar.
>>
>> Any advice on how to achieve this automatically?
>>
>> Thanks & best wishes,
>>
>>     -- Joe
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/**listinfo/lilypond-user<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to