Janek Warchoł <[email protected]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Wim van Dommelen <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Compared with the \clef behaviour, I see this variant: >> >> melody = { \relative c='4 d e f g f e d c \absolute c,, d,, e,, f,, >> g,, \relative c=' d e f } > > I think this may be technically impossible (or at least ugly, > inelegant, prone to errors, weird exceptions and unpleasant > surprises).
Is that your own opinion, or are you just reciting my standard reaction to syntax change proposals? > Currently David seems to be the only one who can actually jugde this > sort of things I surely hope not. But I might be the one pickled most about them. > i think we should trust him if he says that wouldn't be feasible. Well, if we look at it in "temporal order", I have not had a chance to voice my infeasibility rant for this particular proposal before your comment. I did so a few minutes ago, however. If you had delayed sending your posting until then, it would have avoided the impression that I am awfully predictable. On the other hand, there might be some correlation between "this looks like something David would call a bad idea" and something being a bad idea that is significant beyond what can be attributed to the "not invented here" syndrome. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
