On Wed, 2013-04-03 at 12:31 -0600, Eduardo Silva wrote: > > > > > Subject: LilyPond featured in Demo videos. > > From: [email protected] > > To: [email protected] > > Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:00:56 +0000 > > > > Dear LilyPond, > > > > LilyPond features in a demo video that I have posted at > > https://vimeo.com/62188678 to publicise the new version 1.0.0 of > > Denemo, just released. It points out the quality of LilyPond's > > typesetting without manual tweaking. It also shows LilyPond > adjusting > > the layout of the music after transposition without any further user > > intervention (though this example was not chosen to illustrate this > > point, and another example with dynamics, tempo changes etc would do > > that better). > Thank you, Richard. These examples are making me consider Denemo for > note entry. > I had never taken the time to see what it could really offer. I'm glad > it's not a dead project as it appeared to be in the past.
Well, for note entry, especially note entry as a musical activity rather than tedious data entry activity, I don't think Denemo can be beaten. What I think it could also offer for LilyPond users is a way of filing away the tweaks that are needed for more complex scores, so that they only need to be brought back with a mouse-click and then edited as to values for the particular case in hand. I had occasion to do this just now - fishing out the footnote command from Denemo and tweaking the default values for the offset of the footnote mark. The thing is, I would not have remembered the syntax for this tweak, but it was quite obvious what to do with it given the default example. Feedback to help steer Denemo in useful direction is always welcome - thank you. Richard _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
