On 04/09/2013 08:26 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
2013/4/9 Werner LEMBERG<[email protected]>:
It's a very hard problem and probably not solvable.
Ah, I misread, sorry. Yes, it might be worth to test with line
strokes.
I find it most interesting that apparently there is some way to solve
this problem. If line strokes render perfectly, why rounded
rectangles don't?
A completely random guess from an almost, but not quite, entirely
clueless person: because lines have a unique direction, while rectangles
have two. Hence, for a rectangle one of the two choices is bogus.
It might be clever for one type of documents (e.g, Lilypond scores with
lots of stems) to take the smaller extent as stroke width, but you never
know about the side effects for other documents. And that's why they
don't do it.
Besides, rectangles bound /regions,/ and I see a valid point in not
willfully changing regions or areas. For lines, it's slightly more
likely that the designer intended the object to be a line than for
rectangles.
But it might just be that this SA thingie has to be set:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2006-06/msg00275.html>
As I said, I'm clueless...
Just my 2 pennies,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
