>>>>> %{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
>>>>
>>>> I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer
>>>> program doesn't know that word :-)
>>>
>>> Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at
>>> every line.
Really? It's like having a BASIC program which always starts with a
line number:
%{ 1 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 2 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 3 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 4 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 6 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 7 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 8 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 9 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
%{ 10 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 |
As mentioned earlier, I don't like to type this, but having such a
format returned by musicxml2ly is good IMHO. After some time you get
used to it, and line numbers are only looked at if you really need
them.
> In general I think tools like musicxml2ly and other programs that
> convert to or export .ly files (xxx2ly, mscore, denemo, rosegarden)
> should do their best to make the lilypond output look like it was
> handwritten by a "real" human lilypond user and likewise should be
> easily readable and editable by a real human. With proper
> formatting, indentation, and coding style.
I fully agree.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
