Hi All,
I'm having a font issue; I'm trying to use Garamond Premier Pro as my serif
font (to match my document font for a method book). It won't print the s
character. On testing, z printed incorrectly. I switched the font to Adobe
Garamond Pro and had similar issues; some characters wouldn't print
correctly. Could someone point me in the direction of a fix for this
problem?
% Created on Sat Feb 09 15:10:04 EST 2013
\version "2.16.2"
\include "english.ly"
\header {
title = "a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z fl Th"
}
\score {
\new TabStaff {
\relative c' {
\set TabStaff.minimumFret = #5
<a,\6>\bar ":|"
}
}
}
\paper {
myStaffSize = #20
#(define fonts
(make-pango-font-tree "Garamond Premier Pro"
"Helvetica Neue LT Standard"
"Luxi Mono"
(/ myStaffSize 20)))
}
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 7:57 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
> Send lilypond-user mailing list submissions to
> [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re:coloring noteheads different depending on parts (takmi ikeda)
> 2. Re:Scheme education (James Harkins)
> 3. Re:Scheme education (David Kastrup)
> 4. Re:Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper (Colin Hall)
> 5. Re:Scheme education (Colin Hall)
> 6. Re:Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper (David Kastrup)
> 7. Re:Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper (Graham Percival)
> 8. Re:Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper (Urs Liska)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 10:05:27 +0900
> From: takmi ikeda <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: coloring noteheads different depending on parts
> Message-ID:
> <
> canvzgsfg9tvjxm3+nvnqysckgrxyn3293mbcvxagydba9v3...@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> oops. Variable name is my silly mistake. I couldn't understand list
> structure of scheme, difference between #(a. b) #(a b) . Thank you so
> much!
>
> \version "2.16.0"
>
> %%% fixed code
>
> #(define-public ((color-notehead nnn) grob)
>
> (define color-mapping
> (vector
> (list
> (cons (ly:make-pitch 0 0 0) (rgb-color 1 .5 0))
> (cons (ly:make-pitch 0 4 0) (rgb-color .3 .7 0))
> )
> (list
> (cons (ly:make-pitch 0 1 0) (rgb-color 1 0 1))
> (cons (ly:make-pitch 0 5 0) (rgb-color .5 0 1))
> )
> )
> )
>
> (define (pitch-to-color pitch)
> (let*
> (
> (vvv (vector-ref color-mapping nnn))
> (ccc (assoc pitch vvv))
> )
> (if ccc
> (cdr ccc))
> )
> )
>
> (pitch-to-color
> (ly:event-property (event-cause grob) 'pitch))
> )
>
> aaa = \relative c' { c8 d e f g a b c }
>
> \score {
> <<
> \new Staff <<
> \override Staff.NoteHead #'color = #(color-notehead 0)
> \aaa
> >>
> \new Staff <<
> \override Staff.NoteHead #'color = #(color-notehead 1)
> \aaa
> >>
> >>
> }
>
>
>
> 2013/4/19 David Kastrup <[email protected]>:
> > takmi ikeda <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> i'd like to change coloring by argument. have you any idea?
> >>
> >> \version "2.16.0"
> >>
> >> #(define-public ((color-notehead . nnn) grob)
> > (define-public ((color-notehead num) grob)
> >
> >
> >> (vvv (vector-ref color-mapping num)) ;it does not works.
> >
> > Hardly surprising. Wrong variable name. Even if you were write, the
> > define-public used nnn as a rest argument due to the . before it, so any
> > number would have gotten wrapped into a list.
> >
> > --
> > David Kastrup
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lilypond-user mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 01:40:48 +0000 (UTC)
> From: James Harkins < [email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Scheme education
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Jim Long <lilypond <at> umpquanet.com> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:32:19AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, den 19.04.2013, 09:50 +0200 schrieb Stjepan Horvat:
> > > That reminds me of my plan to have an issue tracker for my life
> >
> > The English term for this is, "spouse."
>
> Does this mean I have married org-mode? And if I have, is that marriage
> recognized in all 50 states? (When will THAT case come before the Supreme
> Court?)
>
> hjh
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:15:40 +0200
> From: David Kastrup <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Scheme education
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> James Harkins < [email protected]> writes:
>
> > Jim Long <lilypond <at> umpquanet.com> writes:
> >
> >> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:32:19AM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> >> > Am Freitag, den 19.04.2013, 09:50 +0200 schrieb Stjepan Horvat:
> >> > That reminds me of my plan to have an issue tracker for my life
> >>
> >> The English term for this is, "spouse."
> >
> > Does this mean I have married org-mode? And if I have, is that marriage
> > recognized in all 50 states? (When will THAT case come before the Supreme
> > Court?)
>
> You better read up on "age of consent" and hope nobody notices.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:50:39 +0100
> From: Colin Hall <[email protected]>
> To: "Urs Liska" <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lilypond-User <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>
> Urs Liska writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > today I finished the first draft of a paper on a plain text file based
> > toolchain for writing (about) music. The target audience are people who
> > regularely author such documents but aren't converted yet to 'our'
> > approach to authoring.
> > The text doesn't provide material to 'getting started' but is intended
> > as a mere presentation with the goal of making the target audience
> > curious and to give it a try.
>
> Your paper reads well and the presentation is very clear. The appearance
> is attractive.
>
> Based on five minutes of reading the paper, Urs, I have a couple of
> questions for you.
>
> What is your motivation for writing the document? I can make more
> relevant comments if I know your aims.
>
> Can you be more specific about your audience?
>
> To me your paper seems to be pitched very well for someone who is
> already interested in these ideas but needs guidance. In other words,
> someone who would benefit from this Lilypond library.
>
> I suggest you make a brief, clear statement on the first page of the
> problem that is solved by a text-based approach. Speak from the heart,
> perhaps drawing on your own experience directly.
>
> Can you avoid having the licencing and credits on the first page? I
> found that distracting.
>
> Here is a piece of opinion from me, so you know my position. Users of
> WYSIWYG engraving software accept the shortcomings because it is quick
> and effective. Users of text-based approaches accept the additional
> effort required because they are perfectionists.
>
> Cheers,
> Colin.
>
>
> --
> Colin Hall
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 11:53:04 +0100
> From: Colin Hall <[email protected]>
> To: "David Kastrup" <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Scheme education
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>
> David Kastrup writes:
>
> > Urs Liska <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> >> Am Freitag, den 19.04.2013, 09:50 +0200 schrieb Stjepan Horvat:
> >>> Thanks guys for your anwsers..yes and i want practical
> >>> experience..after i write my first lilypond function..
> >>> I still don't feel ready..i must learn more..
> >>> I am the type of a guy who wants to script everything that is done
> >>> more then once..I'd rather if it would be possible script physical
> >>> stuff too..
> >> That reminds me of my plan to have an issue tracker for my life ;-)
> >
> > Org mode for Emacs ? Your Life in Plain Text
> >
> > <URL:http://orgmode.org>
>
> +1
>
> --
> Colin Hall
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:05:40 +0200
> From: David Kastrup <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
> Colin Hall <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Here is a piece of opinion from me, so you know my position. Users of
> > WYSIWYG engraving software accept the shortcomings because it is quick
> > and effective. Users of text-based approaches accept the additional
> > effort required because they are perfectionists.
>
> Actually, I tend to use text-based approaches not really because I care
> about the perfection of the result, but because it allows me to properly
> separate input, tool and output. Things like the accuracy of my mouse
> positioning don't figure into the result. Which make the result
> actually worse than when working WYSIWYG. But the responsibility for
> that lies with the process, it is reproducible, and it will respond to
> future improvements of the process.
>
> Old scores of mine keep getting better without me having to invest any
> work into any of them. That's hard to beat if they are "good enough" to
> start with. And if you are lazy like me, you won't invest much work of
> your own beyond "good enough" into any individual score.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:13:51 +0100
> From: Graham Percival <[email protected]>
> To: David Kastrup <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
> Message-ID: <20130420111350.GA2068@dissertator>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 01:05:40PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> > Colin Hall <[email protected]> writes:
> >
> > > Here is a piece of opinion from me, so you know my position. Users of
> > > WYSIWYG engraving software accept the shortcomings because it is quick
> > > and effective. Users of text-based approaches accept the additional
> > > effort required because they are perfectionists.
> >
> > Actually, I tend to use text-based approaches not really because I care
> > about the perfection of the result, but because it allows me to properly
> > separate input, tool and output.
>
> I haven't read the paper, but I'll chime in to say that I prefer
> text-based because then I have complete control over my
> "documents" (be they text, source code, or sheet music). When
> using a GUI tool[1], my hard work is at the mercy of some magical
> process which may or may not save the data correctly. If I want
> to view my past work, I'm at the mercy of those tools. When I was
> a composition student, I found that my fellow students would give
> excuses about their scores about once a week ("oh, Finale put a
> dotted line over those notes, but I couldn't figure out how to
> remove it").
>
> [1] yes, a few GUI tools save data in a human-readable format, but
> those are unfortunately rare.
>
>
> By contrast, using a text-based tool (especially in conjunction
> with source control such as git) leaves me in control. If
> anything breaks (which it does occasionally), then I can easily
> compare the previous (working) input to the current version and
> figure how what I did wrong.
>
> - Graham
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 13:57:16 +0200
> From: Urs Liska <[email protected]>
> To: Colin Hall <[email protected]>
> Cc: Lilypond-User <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Request for feedback on 'lobbying' paper
> Message-ID:
> <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> thanks for your valuable comments!
>
> Am Samstag, den 20.04.2013, 11:50 +0100 schrieb Colin Hall:
> > Urs Liska writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > today I finished the first draft of a paper on a plain text file based
> > > toolchain for writing (about) music.
>
> > ...
> >
> > Your paper reads well and the presentation is very clear. The appearance
> > is attractive.
> >
> > Based on five minutes of reading the paper, Urs, I have a couple of
> > questions for you.
> >
> > What is your motivation for writing the document? I can make more
> > relevant comments if I know your aims.
> >
> > Can you be more specific about your audience?
> This is an important comment because it clearly shows that there is some
> work to do.
> (Although I assume that with a revision of that first sketch I would
> have been able to make my points much clearer anyway).
>
> >
> > To me your paper seems to be pitched very well for someone who is
> > already interested in these ideas but needs guidance. In other words,
> > someone who would benefit from this Lilypond library.
> Well, that's not the core of my intention (so there is some work for me
> to do).
> My target audience are people who are involved in writing scores and
> text about music (maybe with a slight personal bias on people who
> prepare editions), but who still use word processors and wysiwyg
> notation programs.
> I want to show them that there's a whole other world with a completely
> different approach, and that this text based approach is well worth the
> effort it takes to get acquainted with it.
>
> When writing this first draft I didn't (couldn't) focus enough on this
> perspective (i.e. developing my arguments for the perspective of
> 'outsiders'), but mainly wanted to collect the material and bring it to
> an order.
>
> So I intended to revise it from that perspective anyway, but I'm glad
> about your comment which tells me that this isn't 'optional' at all ;-)
>
> Next week I will have an oral presentation in my university on that
> topic. Of course I can only present some percentage of the material in
> not more than one hour.
> Of course I will use the feedback from this occasion for revising my
> text.
>
> >
> > I suggest you make a brief, clear statement on the first page of the
> > problem that is solved by a text-based approach. Speak from the heart,
> > perhaps drawing on your own experience directly.
> This is a very good suggestion.
>
> >
> > Can you avoid having the licencing and credits on the first page? I
> > found that distracting.
> This should be possible, I think ;-)
> Maybe we'll have to discuss this as there will be quite a lot of
> documents based on that documentclass ...
>
> >
> > Here is a piece of opinion from me, so you know my position. Users of
> > WYSIWYG engraving software accept the shortcomings because it is quick
> > and effective. Users of text-based approaches accept the additional
> > effort required because they are perfectionists.
> This is a good starting point for making a conclusion.
> But I'd also include/emphasize the points made by other commentors about
> the control it gives.
>
> Best
> Urs
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Colin.
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>
>
> End of lilypond-user Digest, Vol 125, Issue 97
> **********************************************
>
--
*Kale Good: Guitar Instructor*
website: phillyguitarlessons.com
email: [email protected]
phone: (215)260-5383
address: 1867 Frankford Ave.
Philadelphia, PA 19125
Read my article "*The Seven Secrets to Six String Success*" at
GuitarNoise.com:
http://www.guitarnoise.com/lesson/seven-secrets-to-six-string-success/
*Leading the Journey from No-Skills-Guitarist to Talented Musician*!
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
