2013/5/11 Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> > I'm 100% for automated typesetting: it's my dream and the very reason > why i'm using LilyPond. > However, my experience (particularly with Fried project) shows that > with regard to slurs and ties, LilyPond is very far from automated > typesetting. If you want publication quality, you _have_ to tweak the > output quite heavily - would you rather do this via setting > control-points directly? Actually, \shape is quite close to the > spirit of automated engraving, because if the layout changes slightly, > \shape modifications usually "adapt" and still produce good results. > Even with \shape, correcting ties and slurs is still the most > time-consuming task in preparing the Fried material for publication. > Quite frankly, if we didn't have \shape, i'd say that LilyPond was > incapable of handling Fried project :( >
I think I missed this project, all I can find is this: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2013-04/msg00177.html Would you present it in the next LilyPond report? (does anybody still work on it?)
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
