"Phil Burfitt" <[email protected]> writes: > Coming back to Lilypond after some time I'm reminded of what I see as > two syntax niggles... > > 1) Wouldn't it be more logical to have repeat alternative blocks > _within_ the repeat block to which they belong?
Possibly. Changing things like that affects a lot of existing scores, and is not exactly trivial to do. > 2) In relative entry mode, the notes in a second (or more) alternative > are relative to the previous alternative. Wouldn't it make more sense > for them to be relative to the last note in the repeat block? Not really. It's an entry mode, not a playing mode. If you do \repeat unfold 2, the pitches of the second repetition are not relative to the first repetition, either. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
