Shane Brandes <[email protected]> writes: > I am surprised they did not bother to look around and simply declared > copyright to such a thing. After all LilyPond as we use it has been > around at least 10 years now.
17. And they did not declare copyright _to_ LilyPond, but copyright _by_ LilyPond. > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Pierre Perol-Schneider > <[email protected]> wrote: > > with a nice copyright : © 2011 LilyPond > > I'm surprised that one can use LilyPond's name that way. > Any comments ? One can use it if the name is a legal entity: a person with that name, or a corporation. Other than that, it would seem nonsensical. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
